Volta vs. nvm for JavaScript tooling


I work on several JavaScript projects that use nvm (Node Version Manager) for managing Node.js versions. I’ve recently started using Volta to replace nvm and have been very impressed.

I’ll explain the differences between Volta and nvm, and why I’m excited about Volta. Volta’s benefits stem from these two enhancements:

  • Volta installs and uses project-defined tools automatically.
  • Volta has better handling of global scripts.

A note before we start

All of the following assumes we’re working on a project that has added support for Volta. That’s as simple as finding the preferred Node.js and npm or yarn versions and running volta pin:

# cat .nvmrc
lts/*
# grep -A3 engines package.json
        "engines": {
                "node": ">=10.0.0",
                "npm": ">=6.9.0"
        },
# volta pin node@lts npm@6
success: pinned node@14.15.5 in package.json
success: pinned npm@6.14.11 in package.json

This will add a volta property to package.json which is how Volta keeps track of versions.

Magically get the right tool

nvm exists to handle Node.js versions, what makes Volta better? nvm requires you to either always run commands when switching projects (nvm use) or add helpers to your shell. These are surmountable, but Volta just handles it.

nvm will handle Node.js nicely, but what npm or yarn? Are you struggling with package-lock.json version changes as folks move from npm v6 to v7?

Volta has you covered, we pinned the tool in our project so we’ll always use that version. Check it out:

# node --version
v14.15.5
# npm --version
6.14.11
# cd ..
# npm --version
7.5.2
# node --version
v15.8.0
# cd -
# node --version
v14.15.5

Magically get the right version of the right tool

That’s cool. My project just upgraded Node.js, what’s that like?

Volta knows the right tool for the job

Did I mention Volta knows the right tool?

I do a lot of TypeScript development and use tsc (the TypeScript compiler command line interface) a bunch. It’s handy to have tsc available globally, but different versions support different language features.

I can install tsc for use anywhere with npm install --global typescript, but when I switch to my project I have to remember to use its tsc from node_modules/.bin/tsc

Not with Volta. It will magically use the bin from your project if it’s included or the global install otherwise:

# volta install typescript@beta
success: installed typescript@4.2.0-beta with executables: tsc, tsserver
# tsc --version
Version 4.2.0-dev
# cd gutenberg/
# tsc --version
Version 4.1.3

Nice, right?

What else?

nvm keeps your global npm installs associated with a particular version of Node.js. That’s good because they don’t break when you switch versions, but annoying because the available scripts are completely different when you change Node.js versions.

Yeah, Volta handles. that. Global scripts are associated with the Node.js version that installed them so they’re stable.

Sold?

Me too. Head to over to the Volta docs to get started, or run their installer and get rolling:

curl https://get.volta.sh | bash
volta install node@lts

You should be able to try nvm and Volta without fully committing by commenting out the the relevant block in your shell’s rc (e.g. ~/.bashrc). Look for the blocks like export NVM_DIR= or export VOLTA_HOME= and comment out the one you’d like to disable.


5 responses to “Volta vs. nvm for JavaScript tooling”

  1. Volta is great unless you’re using Windows and WebStorm. WebStorm can’t find npm, and JetBrains doesn’t care (hasn’t for more than a year): https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/WEB-44867
    You can say, use VS Code instead – sure, but that doesn’t really work for large projects. Stuff that works well in WebStorm simply doesn’t in VS Code, or takes ages to complete (like move refactorings).

    • It’s unfortunate some tooling is implemented in ways that are incompatible with Volta. There do seem to be some workarounds proposed in that issue, but if you have to deal with workarounds it’s going to negate much of the “just works” benefits I’ve found with Volta.

      I don’t think we can write off tools like VS Code for large projects. I know many professional developer working on large projects that use VS Code as their primary editor very effectively. I used it myself for an extended period and was generally impressed with the experience. What limitations have you found with VS Code?

      • Looking at it from the other side of long existing tools… It’s unfortunate some tooling is implemented in ways that are incompatible with IntelliJ tools. There do seem to be some workarounds, but if you have to deal with workarounds it’s going to negate much of the “just works” benefits I’ve found with IntelliJ tools.

        I don’t think we can write off tools like WebStorm for large projects. I know many professional developers working on large projects that use WebStorm as their primary editor very effectively.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: